The founders who cashed out on YouTube, Reddit, and Instagram—and missed out on becoming today’s billionaires

The founders who cashed out on YouTube, Reddit, and Instagram—and missed out on becoming today’s billionaires

The founders who cashed out on YouTube, Reddit, and Instagram—and missed out on becoming today’s billionaires

To sell or not to sell.

That’s the major dilemma founders around the world face: Once they’ve started to get big enough to attract the attention of buyers, they face the decision of whether to cash out now, or use the compliment as fuel to go even bigger.

While it may seem like a no-brainer to say yes to an acquisition to the tune of millions—or even billions—it can be hard to later rest easy thinking about how much more you could have made independently.

There may be no better recent case study than Mark Zuckerberg. In 2006, he received massive offers—$750 million from Viacom and $900 million from Yahoo—to buy out Facebook. But, as a 22-year-old, he was bullish that he still had plenty of runway left.

“We’re focused on building the company for the long term,” Zuckerberg said at the time. Today, the social platform now known as Meta is worth just over $1.9 trillion—a 2,100x increase over two decades. And Zuckerberg’s own wealth has ballooned to over $260 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire Index.

Years later, Facebook began to make its own acquisitions; notably offering to buy Snapchat for $3 billion in 2013. But, Snap founder Evan Spiegel resisted, and today, the photo social platform is worth $12 billion.

Of course, in both of these instances, the founders are now members of the ultrawealthy and made far more by waiting versus selling out early. However, this isn’t the reality for everyone.

When YouTube’s first-ever video—”Meet me at the zoo”—went live in 2005, no one could have expected that the video platform would explode onto the internet.

The growth was so substantial that just over a year after founding, cofounders Chad Hurley, Steven Chen and Jawed Karim decided that Google’s $1.65 billion offer was too good to resist.

“This is great,” Hurley said in a video posted when the sale was in fall 2006. “Two kings have gotten together. The king of search, the king of video have gotten together. We’re going to have it our way.”

Hurley, YouTube’s then-CEO, received shares worth about $345 million by the time the Securities and Exchange Commission documents were released a few months later, according to The New York Times. Chen, YouTube’s then-CTO, received about $326 million in shares; and Jawed Karim, who left the venture early to go back to school, got $64 million.

While the sale made them financially secure for life and cemented their status as tech pioneers, it was just a fraction of the $550 billion that YouTube is valued at today, a 333x increase (unadjusted for inflation). For Hurley and Chen, their current slice could be worth some $100 billion each.